Neftaly Research Evaluation Criteria Template
Research Project:
Researcher(s):
Date of Evaluation:
Evaluator:
Evaluation Categories and Criteria
| Criteria | Description | Rating (1–5) | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Relevance | Alignment of research objectives with Neftaly’s mission and goals. | ||
| 2. Clarity of Objectives | Clear, specific, and achievable research questions or hypotheses. | ||
| 3. Methodology | Appropriateness and rigor of research methods used. | ||
| 4. Data Collection | Adequacy and reliability of data collection techniques. | ||
| 5. Data Analysis | Accuracy, depth, and appropriateness of data analysis. | ||
| 6. Findings and Insights | Relevance, originality, and clarity of research findings. | ||
| 7. Practical Implications | Usefulness of results for policy, advocacy, or project planning. | ||
| 8. Reporting Quality | Clarity, structure, and professionalism of the written report. | ||
| 9. Ethical Considerations | Adherence to ethical standards in research conduct. | ||
| 10. Timeliness | Completion of research within agreed timelines. |
Overall Evaluation Score: ______ / 50
Summary Comments:
[Provide a concise summary of strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations for improvement.]
Leave a Reply